Oct 112026
 

The memes are all over the place, ridiculing Trump and his attempt to appease murderous dictator Putin and get some Russian diesel in exchange. The ridicule is justified, even when the memes sometimes overstate the case. Or understate?

Illustration by DALL-E

What Trump announced is that Russia may be able to supply 300,000 barrels of diesel to global markets in November. Mr. Stable Genius concludes that this will lower fuel prices worldwide.

Now it so happens that 300,000 barrels amounts to… wait for it… about 12-15 hours of diesel consumption in the United States of America. It also happens to be less than the amount of diesel fuel supplied to the United States by, you know, arch-enemy, “worst country ever” Canada, in just two days.

But then, as I think about it, I have to admit: Perhaps Trump does have a spark of genius after all. For it is clear that this is not about lowering global fuel prices or alleviating the hardships of those in the United States whose livelihoods depend on diesel.

Rather, it is an attempt to deflect responsibility: to hide the fact that high diesel prices are a direct consequence of Trump’s disastrous war with Iran and blame Ukraine’s president Zelensky instead.

And the sad part is that no matter how transparent, Trump’s cheap sleight of hand may very well work with the MAGA crowd just as it has in the past, on everything from COVID vaccines to tariffs.

 Posted by at 1:36 pm
Oct 102026
 

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. — Framed statement seen on the office wall of Salvor Hardin, mayor of the planet Terminus, in Isaac Asimov’s Foundation.

Illustration by DALL-E

I was reminded of this quote repeatedly in recent days.

  • I was reminded of this when I was thinking about Putin and his murderous war in Ukraine.
  • I was reminded of this as I was thinking about Trump and his ICE thugs shooting people in American cities.
  • Or when I heard that Hegseth plans to livestream an upcoming public execution.
  • Or, as I was thinking about Modi and the Indian crackdown on the “cockroach” protests.
  • Or thinking about Netanyahu’s choice of perpetual conflict over the humiliation of being voted out of office and having to face punishment for corruption.
  • Or the Saudis and their Yemeni friends vs. the Houthis, beating the crap out of each other in yet another pointless war.
  • Or Trump’s on-again, off-again war in Iran against a regime that, when it’s not busy pissing off Trump, goes into overtime repressing and executing its own citizens.

Asimov was right. We may yet see a far future (if our AI creations don’t eat us first) in which humanity will rule over a Galactic Empire. But, chances are, we won’t be one iota smarter than we are today, just as we are not any smarter today than we were at the dawn of civilization. Just consider the motto of my favorite computer game franchise, Fallout: “War. War never changes…”

 Posted by at 2:04 pm
Oct 102026
 

I’ve now read several articles condemning Hegseth’s statement that the planned execution of the Fort Hood attacker will be publicly streamed. Arguments against included psychology (it’s revenge), politics (terrorists are not deterred), history (racism, lynchings in America) and ethics.

I say nonsense.

No, it does not mean that I suddenly became a fan of the barbaric practice of calling the killing of a human being, however wretched and evil, a form of “justice”. What I do mean is that the arguments listed are really arguments against executions in general, not arguments against making the event a public spectacle.

And you know what… if your proud society feels entitled to terminate a human life, damn it, make it public! Face the reality of what you are doing! In fact, make sure it’s livestreamed in all schools, shown on big screens in public places! I mean after all, you should not be ashamed of administering “justice”, right?

Illustration by DALL-E

I, for one, am glad to live in a country that has not executed a single person since before I was born, removed the death penalty from the criminal code half a century ago, and from the National Defence Act in 1998.

 Posted by at 12:34 pm
Oct 022026
 

I first read this novel, The Prometheus Crisis, by Thomas N. Scortia and Frank M. Robinson (known also for the book, The Glass Inferno, which was one of the novels on which the 1974 disaster flick The Towering Inferno was based), in the late 1970s. Originally published in 1975 in the United States, it was eventually translated into Hungarian and published there. I still recall vividly that I could not put the book down: I spent most of the night reading it, and as a result, I was rather sleepy throughout the next day.

The novel tells the story of a nuclear disaster at a fictitious California nuclear power plant near Los Angeles. It follows several protagonists, including the plant manager, townspeople and others as they struggle (and sometimes fail) to survive.

Recently, I managed to grab a copy of the original paperback and I read it again. I was, I must say, rather taken aback by how fresh the book still felt, despite being half a century old. More importantly, how closely the fictitious events of the meltdown and environmental consequences matched the reality of Chernobyl, which took place just over a decade after The Prometheus Crisis was published.

And no, I don’t mean the technical details, though they are impressive. No, what I mean is the initial response to the disaster, botched evacuations, and above all, the political cover-up, the lies, all the plausible deniability. In fact, if anything, the ficititious anti-heroes of the novel are worse than the Soviet-era apparatchiks who were responsible for the initial lies, news blackouts and delayed evacuation following the meltdown of reactor 4 at the Chernobyl NPP. The evacuations depicted by the novel are also far less humane than what actual eyewitness accounts tell us from Pripyat and Chernobyl.

The authors explain that their unflattering view of the political response was based in no small part on what America witnessed in the wake of Watergate and ultimately, Nixon’s resignation. Those were indeed strange times, though I admit that those events look surprisingly tame from the perspective of 2026.

Either way, the novel is still good. Too bad it was never turned into a movie; it’d have made one heck of a disaster flick.

 Posted by at 5:34 pm