January 2025 – Spinor Info

Pumping elephant

Jan 212025

I cannot stop laughing.

Earlier today, I came across one of the weirdest papers yet that I’ve ever come across in the scientific literature.

I admit that my first thought was that it was a joke paper in a predatory journal. But no. It was a serious publication, in a serious journal, published under the Springer Nature label, no less.

And like all proper scientific publications, it had a title, an abstract, and… No, wait. It did not have an abstract. What it had instead was…

A pumping elephant.

Seriously. A pumping elephant.

But if it was not a joke paper, then what was it? Having noticed that the paper’s authors were all Chinese, it occurred to me that perhaps it’s a mistranslation. The AI Claude quickly confirmed my suspicion. Apparently, the authors mistranslated “Abstract” as “抽象” (chōuxiàng) in Chinese, which does mean “abstract” but in the sense of “abstract concept” rather than “summary of a paper”. They then literally translated 抽 (chōu), which can mean “to pump” and 象 (xiàng), which can mean “elephant”.

So perhaps it was an embarrassing but ultimately innocent mistake by the paper’s authors.

The same cannot be said about the journal’s editorial staff. That such a glaring piece of nonsense made it to the pages of a reputable journal signals a complete lack of copy-editing and editorial supervision.

To their credit, the paper was ultimately retracted. And it only took about three and a half years…

I asked Midjourney to create for me a pumping elephant. Clearly inspired by Verne’s famous novel, The Steam House, Midjourney produced some wonderful steampunk pumping elephants. This is my favorite so far.

Incidentally, there are also YouTube videos of bona fide pumping elephants: Elephants that learned to use a water pump.

Needless to say, I’ll be sorely tempted to use “Pumping elephant” to label the Abstract in my future publications…

Hello, Freddy

Cats, Personal 4 Responses »

Jan 192025

Hello, Freddy. Please say hello to the world.

Hello, world. Please say hello to Freddy.

A cartographic reminder

Canada, Politics 3 Responses »

Jan 182025

Here is my attempt to remind our illustrious world leaders of the importance of proper cartography:

Is it really too much to hope for that they respect the esteemed profession of mapmaking?

2025

Canada, Cats, Cybernetics, Politics No Responses »

Jan 082025

We are barely a week into the new year, 2025. Yet here are some news items that would have sounded like outlandish B-movie nonsense just a few years ago.

The incoming president-elect of the United States expressed his interest in annexing Greenland, and did not rule out the use of force against a NATO ally;
The incoming president-elect of the United States expressed his interest in reoccupying the Panama Canal zone and did not rule out the use of force;
The incoming president-elect mused about turning Canada into the 51st state and did not rule out the use of “economic force” to accomplish this;
Ukraine’s offensive in Russia’s Kursk region led to a large number of casualties on the Russian side, including thousands of North Korean troops;
North Korea successfully tested a new intermediate-range missile;
An article in Foreign Affairs magazine argues that South Korea should acquire nuclear capability for deterrence;
After several similar incidents involving Russian ships in the Baltic Sea, now a Chinese vessel damaged undersea cables connecting Taiwan;
A far-right politician in EU member state Austria is set to form the next government of the country;
Alien ship set to land in New York’s Central Park turns back at the last minute – “Too dangerous, no intelligent life,” they message their home planet.

OK, I threw in the last one. But the rest? In 2025? Aren’t they just as outlandish as the bit about aliens? Aren’t we, and by that I mean the whole human race, supposed to be, you know, a tad more intelligent?

Guess not. Can’t wait for the world to be taken over by AI-assisted cats.

Unsolicited theories

Personal, Science No Responses »

Jan 072025

I just made up my mind.

I’ll never again respond to unsolicited theories, unsolicited requests to comment, not even from Nobel-prize winners.

Because in the end, unless I enthusiastically agree with their ideas, no matter how silly, how outlandish, it always ends badly.

It doesn’t matter how polite I am, how carefully I choose my words, how much I try my darnedest to steer them in the right direction. And it makes no difference if the person in question is just, say, a taxi driver somewhere in Asia or an accomplished scientist in Europe.

If you have a scientific idea, do the right thing: write it up, send it to a journal, publish it. I am officially not interested anymore. Sorry, but I’ve been insulted one too many times and finally, my fuse got blown. I have better things to do than nursing your hurt feelings because the science community is not treating you seriously.

In fact, chances are that in the future, I’ll blacklist all such e-mail addresses right away. My sanity is more important than your feelings.

The economy vs. the economy

Canada, Economy, Politics No Responses »

Jan 042025

I don’t much watch news channels anymore, but earlier today, I caught a fragment of a report arguing that voters are not rejecting the left because of the economy; that the shift to the right is occurring at a time when the economy is doing fairly well, and that there was no similar shift to the right during the last major economic crisis.

A few hours later (or maybe less) on the same channel I caught a fragment of a report about CEO pay here in Canada: for the top 100 (?) companies, it is now well over 200 times the average worker’s salary. The report pointed out that barely more than a decade ago, it was “only” a little over 100 times the average worker’s salary.

So perhaps, just perhaps, it’s the economy after all?

One of the better attempts by Midjourney

I mean, maybe the economy is doing great insofar as macroeconomic indicators are concerned. But we don’t live off macroeconomic indicators. We do not pay with macroeconomic indicators for groceries at Loblaws, nor do banks accept macroeconomic indicators in lieu of a mortgage payment. And it doesn’t matter if the economy is doing great overall, if rising inequality means the middle class is left behind.

And this is how we end up in dangerous times, in ways already well understood by Aristotle some 2600 years ago. The unhappiness is palpable. This drives people to political extremism. Yet all too often, those with the power to do something about it just congratulate themselves on an economy doing great, and express incomprehension when confronted with dissatisfied voters. Must be bad messaging, they say. Perhaps foreign interference. Stupid people falling for populism.

All of the above exists of course. But the root cause, I think, is much simpler: For most voters, the economy (the economy that they experience paycheck-to-paycheck, the economy they experience at the grocery store checkout counter, at the bank when trying to get a mortgage) is not doing great. In fact, it is doing terribly. And they are getting really pissed off about it. Which of course means fertile ground for political populism.