I just had a brilliant idea*, something to help Canada as we are threatened by Trump’s tariffs, his calls to annex Canada as the 51st state, not to mention the tangible dangers represented by our militaristic northern neighbor Putinistan.
Would our British friends object terribly if Canada asked to rejoin the United Kingdom, turning the realm into the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Canada?
I admit that my crazy proposal is based on enlightened self-interest: The UK is a powerful country, with a strong military that also possesses a capable nuclear deterrent. But I think the UK would also benefit substantially from this newfound unity. Canada has a lot to offer, including land, resources, industries, and more. And we wouldn’t even have to change much… after all, we already share the same King, and, well, I’m sure our British friends would be willing to accommodate at least a small addition to the Union Jack…
Oh, Quebec, you ask? Well, the UK today is not the UK of the past. I suspect that a future United Kingdom that includes Canada would not only welcome français québécois as an important language along with Irish, Scots, Welsh and a host of other languages, the new realm would also fiercely defend the cultural integrity, independence, distinctness of the society of la belle province.
Vive le Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne, d’Irlande du Nord et du Canada!
*I was inspired in part by the Privy Council’s role in deciding The Persons Case of 1929 and the consequent Living tree doctrine. If the Privy Council—arguably one of the more conservative institutions on the planet—could be so forward-thinking back in 1929, we may not be in bad company, should my proposal take hold.
Sounds like a good idea, as long as DJT doesn’t decide to force his will militarily, ultimately with many more nukes than we (the UK) possess.
Checking on the constitutional aspects in relation to KCIII, with a quick summary from ChatGPT4o, it looks like the connections are already close enough to slide fairly easily from Commonwealth to “C_ACCESSION” as long as your québécois agree:
“King Charles III is Canada’s head of state in his role as the monarch of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms. While this position is largely ceremonial in Canada, it carries important constitutional and symbolic functions.
Key Aspects of King Charles III’s Role in Canada
Constitutional Role
As Canada’s sovereign, King Charles III is part of the country’s parliamentary structure. Canada’s Constitution Act, 1867 identifies the King as the formal executive authority, though this power is exercised almost entirely by elected officials.
The King’s duties are carried out on his behalf by the Governor General, who is appointed by the King on the advice of the Canadian Prime Minister. The Governor General handles daily constitutional and ceremonial duties.
Ceremonial Role
The King’s presence or references are common in key national symbols, such as on coins, stamps, and in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
He may visit Canada for state functions or celebrations, reinforcing the monarchy’s connection with the country.
Legal and Executive Role
All Canadian laws are formally enacted in the King’s name. For example, bills passed by Parliament require Royal Assent before becoming law.
Canadian officials, military personnel, and judges swear allegiance to the King.
Symbol of Unity and Continuity
The monarch is seen as a unifying figure above politics, ensuring stability across political transitions.
Key Distinction
While King Charles III is technically the head of state, the Prime Minister and elected Parliament hold actual governing power. The King does not interfere in political decisions.
In Practice
The King’s role is now largely symbolic, but it reinforces Canada’s constitutional structure as a constitutional monarchy within the Commonwealth of Nations.”