{"id":5006,"date":"2013-05-24T22:24:19","date_gmt":"2013-05-25T02:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=5006"},"modified":"2013-05-25T08:09:59","modified_gmt":"2013-05-25T12:09:59","slug":"eric-weinsteins-theory-of-everything","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=5006","title":{"rendered":"Eric Weinstein&#8217;s Theory of Everything"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.xkcd.com\/793\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-5007\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/physicists.png\" width=\"286\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/physicists.png 358w, https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/physicists-198x300.png 198w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 286px) 100vw, 286px\" \/><\/a>Physics blog sites are abuzz about Eric Weinstein and his Amazing New Theory of Everything. For a moment, I actually confused him with Eric Weisstein, well known in physics and math circles as the founder of <a href=\"http:\/\/http:\/\/mathworld.wolfram.com\/\">Mathworld<\/a>, which, in the pre-Wikipedia days, was the Internet&#8217;s pre-eminent mathematics encyclopedia (only to be hijacked for a while by an unscrupulous CRC press). No, Weinstein is someone else: he is a mathematical physicist turned economist. In any case, he is no dummy, nor does he appear to be a crackpot. He is outside of academia, but, well, so am I, so who am I to complain?<\/p>\n<p>So Weinstein gets invited to Oxford to give a public lecture, and he talks, for the first time, about ideas he has been working on for the past twenty years, about unifying physics.<\/p>\n<p>This is greeted by a headline in <em>The Guardian<\/em> that reads, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/blog\/2013\/may\/23\/roll-over-einstein-meet-weinstein\">Roll over Einstein: meet Weinstein<\/a>&#8220;. Others follow suit, and soon physics news and blog sites far and wide discuss&#8230; what, exactly? Well, no-one really knows.<\/p>\n<p>That is because Weinstein has not published anything yet. Not even a non-peer reviewed manuscript on arxiv.org. This is pointed out in one of the few sensibly skeptical blog posts, written <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/cocktail-party-physics\/2013\/05\/24\/dear-guardian-youve-been-played\/\">by Jennifer Ouellette on Scientific American&#8217;s blog site<\/a>. Ouellette actually quotes a tweet by Sean Carroll: &#8220;Pretty sure Einstein actually wrote research papers, not just gave interviews to newspapers.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ouellette goes on to quote Oxford cosmologist Andrew Pontzen, who observes that these &#8220;shenanigans&#8221; have &#8220;short-circuited science\u2019s basic checks and balances&#8221;. I couldn&#8217;t agree more. This is true even if Weinstein turns out to be right in the end.<\/p>\n<p>Which is conceivable, since Weinstein is no crackpot. But it is much more likely that his theory will join many others, including Garrett &#8220;surfer dude&#8221; Lisi&#8217;s aesthetically beautiful E8 theory, that just don&#8217;t have much to do with observable reality.<\/p>\n<fb:like href='https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=5006' send='true' layout='standard' show_faces='true' width='450' height='65' action='like' colorscheme='light' font='lucida grande'><\/fb:like>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Physics blog sites are abuzz about Eric Weinstein and his Amazing New Theory of Everything. For a moment, I actually confused him with Eric Weisstein, well known in physics and math circles as the founder of Mathworld, which, in the pre-Wikipedia days, was the Internet&#8217;s pre-eminent mathematics encyclopedia (only to be hijacked for a while <a href='https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=5006' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","category-3-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5006"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5006\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5022,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5006\/revisions\/5022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}