{"id":11491,"date":"2022-12-09T12:29:38","date_gmt":"2022-12-09T17:29:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=11491"},"modified":"2022-12-09T12:29:38","modified_gmt":"2022-12-09T17:29:38","slug":"more-chatgpt-adventures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/?p=11491","title":{"rendered":"More ChatGPT adventures"},"content":{"rendered":"

Inspired by examples I saw elsewhere, I figured I’d test ChatGPT some more. This time around, I asked it to spot a programming error, and while its answer was flawed, it was not altogether wrong.<\/p>\n

Here is our brief conversation (ChatGPT also adds some nice colorized code formatting that I shall not attempt to reproduce here):<\/p>\n

Can you spot the bug in the following C-language code fragment?<\/strong><\/p>\n

char *str = \"SOME TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = malloc(strlen(str));\r\nstrcpy(buf, str);<\/pre>\n
The code is missing a null terminator character <\/em>'\\0'<\/tt> at the end of the string assigned to buf. The <\/em>strcpy<\/tt> function does not automatically add a null terminator character when copying the string from <\/em>str<\/tt> to <\/em>buf<\/tt>, so <\/em>buf<\/tt> will not be a properly-formatted string.<\/em><\/p>\n
To fix the code, you can add a null terminator character to the end of <\/em>buf<\/tt> after it has been copied from <\/em>str<\/tt>, like this:<\/em><\/p>\n
char *str = \"SOME TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = malloc(strlen(str) + 1); \/\/ Add one to include space for the null terminator character\r\nstrcpy(buf, str);\r\nbuf[strlen(str)] = '\\0'; \/\/ Add the null terminator character at the end of the string<\/pre>\n
Alternatively, you can use the <\/em>strdup function to copy <\/em>str into <\/em>buf, which automatically adds a null terminator character to the end of the copied string, like this:<\/em><\/p>\n
char *str = \"SOME TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = strdup(str);<\/pre>\n
Note that the <\/em>strdup<\/tt> function is not a standard C library function and may not be available on all platforms.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Pretty darn close! The AI correctly noticed that there is a problem with the terminating null character. But it’s not what it says: it’s not that strcpy<\/tt> won’t copy the string terminator. Quite the contrary, the problem is that strcpy<\/tt> does<\/em> copy that terminating null, but we have not allocated memory for it: strlen<\/tt> returns the length of the string without that terminator.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, the AI seems to be aware of this as in the corrected version, it adds room for that extra byte. The corrected code is error-free but redundant: the last line is not required, because strcpy would have already copied the terminating null. This line would be required, on the other hand, if we had used strncpy.<\/p>\n
The suggestion to use strdup<\/tt> is a good one, except that contrary to the caveat, strdup<\/tt> is now part of the upcoming ISO C standard.<\/p>\n
Still, it is doing better already than many a C programmer I knew. So how about offering it a really tricky related problem?<\/p>\n
The following C-language code fragment works:<\/strong><\/p>\n
char *str = \"SOME TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = malloc(strlen(str));\r\nstrcpy(buf, str);<\/pre>\n
but if I replace the first line with<\/strong><\/p>\n
char *str = \"A DIFFERENT TEXT\";<\/pre>\n
the program crashes. Can you explain why?<\/strong><\/p>\n
When you replace the first line of the code with char <\/em>*str = \"A DIFFERENT TEXT\";<\/tt>, the length of the string assigned to str increases, but the size of the memory allocated for <\/em>buf<\/tt> remains the same. This causes a buffer overflow, which can lead to a crash or other undefined behavior.<\/em><\/p>\n
To fix this issue, you can use the <\/em>strlen<\/tt> function to calculate the length of the string assigned to <\/em>str<\/tt> and allocate enough memory for <\/em>buf<\/tt> to hold the entire string, like this:<\/em><\/p>\n
char *str = \"A DIFFERENT TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = malloc(strlen(str) + 1); \/\/ Add one to include space for the null terminator character\r\nstrcpy(buf, str);<\/pre>\n
Alternatively, you can use the <\/em>strdup<\/tt> function to copy <\/em>str<\/tt> into <\/em>buf<\/tt>, which automatically allocates enough memory for the entire string, including the null terminator character, like this:<\/em><\/p>\n
char *str = \"A DIFFERENT TEXT\";\r\nchar *buf = strdup(str);<\/pre>\n
Note that the <\/em>strdup<\/tt> function is not a standard C library function and may not be available on all platforms.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Really close! But no, it’s not that the size of the memory allocated for the buffer remains the same. It’s that in both cases, the size of the memory allocated for the buffer failed to include room for the terminating null character. However, in the first case the string was 9 bytes long, or 10 with the terminating null. On most modern platforms, memory is allocated in units of 32-bit words or larger, so at the very least, there’d he 12 bytes allocated, leaving enough room for the terminator. But in the second case, the text is exactly 16 bytes long. Chances are that the call to malloc<\/tt> will allocate exactly 16 bytes, and therefore, copying the terminating null will cause a buffer overflow, overwriting something else that it shouldn’t.<\/p>\n
Still, even though its reasoning is flawed, the AI’s proposed fix is spot on: include room for the null terminator!<\/p>\n
I am not unimpressed. Yet all these examples tend to remind me of the behavior of the “teacher’s pet” A-student who memorizes a lot, can even apply simple reasoning, but lacks in-depth understanding.<\/p>\n<\/fb:like>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Inspired by examples I saw elsewhere, I figured I’d test ChatGPT some more. This time around, I asked it to spot a programming error, and while its answer was flawed, it was not altogether wrong. Here is our brief conversation (ChatGPT also adds some nice colorized code formatting that I shall not attempt to reproduce […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cybernetics","category-programming","category-58-id","category-36-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11491"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11495,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11491\/revisions\/11495"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spinor.info\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}