<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Spinor Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinor.info/weblog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinor.info/weblog</link>
	<description>A web site about physics and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The day against DRM by vttoth</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2973&#038;cpage=1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>vttoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2973#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are right. We are unlikely to ever &quot;get caught&quot; for copying a DVD to our hard drives or viewing a foreign region coded DVD on a PC with the help of some Chinese or Caribbean software. But... laws like this that criminalize everyday common behavior are Ayn Rand&#039;s nightmare: a society in which everyone is a potential criminal.

On a more mundane note, copyright law is supposed to be a balanced bargain between society and the rights holder: in exchange for obtaining a limited monopoly protecting the work, the rights holder grants society certain rights (including &quot;fair use&quot;). By criminalizing the breaking of digital locks even when the intended usage would otherwise be lawful, they are basically negating all such provisions in the law and the monopoly becomes absolute. This, I think, is just plain wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right. We are unlikely to ever &#8220;get caught&#8221; for copying a DVD to our hard drives or viewing a foreign region coded DVD on a PC with the help of some Chinese or Caribbean software. But&#8230; laws like this that criminalize everyday common behavior are Ayn Rand&#8217;s nightmare: a society in which everyone is a potential criminal.</p>
<p>On a more mundane note, copyright law is supposed to be a balanced bargain between society and the rights holder: in exchange for obtaining a limited monopoly protecting the work, the rights holder grants society certain rights (including &#8220;fair use&#8221;). By criminalizing the breaking of digital locks even when the intended usage would otherwise be lawful, they are basically negating all such provisions in the law and the monopoly becomes absolute. This, I think, is just plain wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The day against DRM by steve b</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2973&#038;cpage=1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>steve b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2973#comment-140</guid>
		<description>While I agree that C-11 sounds like a Bad Thing, is this not a situation similar to jaywalking, where unless you are dumb enough to commit the violation right in front of an enforcement officer, the state simply does not have the capacity to notice violations? (Unless they are specifically looking at you anyway, in which case you are screwed, regardless ... :-( )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that C-11 sounds like a Bad Thing, is this not a situation similar to jaywalking, where unless you are dumb enough to commit the violation right in front of an enforcement officer, the state simply does not have the capacity to notice violations? (Unless they are specifically looking at you anyway, in which case you are screwed, regardless &#8230; <img src='http://spinor.info/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An amazing book: A Cultural History of Physics by vttoth</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830&#038;cpage=1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>vttoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you like it. The RSS feed subscription links are actually there on the right-hand side, underneath the Archives and Categories widgets, in the Meta widget. Will these links do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you like it. The RSS feed subscription links are actually there on the right-hand side, underneath the Archives and Categories widgets, in the Meta widget. Will these links do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An amazing book: A Cultural History of Physics by suren</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830&#038;cpage=1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>suren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I was searching for a link for subscribing to this blog, but could not find it. (As you are aware, the subscription link can be enabled/added by configuring from blog administration). According to me, this is a &quot;must subscribe&quot; blog, so hoping to see a link in the right-side menu bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was searching for a link for subscribing to this blog, but could not find it. (As you are aware, the subscription link can be enabled/added by configuring from blog administration). According to me, this is a &#8220;must subscribe&#8221; blog, so hoping to see a link in the right-side menu bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An amazing book: A Cultural History of Physics by vttoth</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830&#038;cpage=1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>vttoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind comments. My reasons were purely economic; I lament the loss of quality manufacturing jobs in North America, and I am trying to vote with my wallet when possible.The actual quality of the book is impeccable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind comments. My reasons were purely economic; I lament the loss of quality manufacturing jobs in North America, and I am trying to vote with my wallet when possible.The actual quality of the book is impeccable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An amazing book: A Cultural History of Physics by surendrank@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830&#038;cpage=1#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>surendrank@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830#comment-136</guid>
		<description>And I must admit and I admire the vastness and variety of content in this blog. Many of the articles are excellent read. Thanks and Congrats...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I must admit and I admire the vastness and variety of content in this blog. Many of the articles are excellent read. Thanks and Congrats&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An amazing book: A Cultural History of Physics by surendrank@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830&#038;cpage=1#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>surendrank@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2830#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. By the way, what was surprising to me is that you mentioned the following, (and that too for a book on &#039;cultural history&#039;)  &quot; My only disappointment is that my copy was printed in India. I guess that’s one way to shave a few bucks off the production cost, but I would have paid more happily for a copy printed in the US or Canada. &quot; What is the reason? Quality or Printing? Patriotism? or something other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. By the way, what was surprising to me is that you mentioned the following, (and that too for a book on &#8216;cultural history&#8217;)  &#8221; My only disappointment is that my copy was printed in India. I guess that’s one way to shave a few bucks off the production cost, but I would have paid more happily for a copy printed in the US or Canada. &#8221; What is the reason? Quality or Printing? Patriotism? or something other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physics vs. economics by Study Channels of PakistanPhysics vs. economics » Spinor Info &#187; Study Channels of Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2909&#038;cpage=1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Study Channels of PakistanPhysics vs. economics » Spinor Info &#187; Study Channels of Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2909#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] post: Physics vs. economics » Spinor Info        Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Physics vs. economics » Spinor Info        Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on -30? Brrrrr&#8230; by steve b</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2566&#038;cpage=1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>steve b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2566#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Interesting, since Environment Canada thinks the overnight low at the airport was only -23 or so. Outlier, indeed ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, since Environment Canada thinks the overnight low at the airport was only -23 or so. Outlier, indeed &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statistics by steve b</title>
		<link>http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2471&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>steve b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinor.info/weblog/?p=2471#comment-131</guid>
		<description>A couple of points:

First, about the war - Saddam certain had WMDs in the past. We know that because he used them, both against Iran in the Iran-Iraq war, and against his own population. Saddam was also quite openly supporting and sponsoring Palestinian terrorists (he held frequent press conferences about this, where he gave $25k payments to the families of suicide bombers) and allowed at least one senior AQ guy to receive medical treatment in Iraq. AQ then went on to demonstrate a sophisticated capability to attack the US homeland. When you combine all of that with the fact that EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. of the world&#039;s major foreign intelligence agencies was saying that Saddam STILL had WMDs, that adds up to an intolerable threat - Iraqi WMDs delivered to the USA by terrorists. It doesn&#039;t matter who was in the White House, or what party he was from. The moment the second plane hit the World Trade Center, Saddam was a dead man. 

Second, about those WMDs - The entire WMD arsenal of any nation other than the three superpowers would fit comfortably into a three bedroom townhouse. Thanks to the miracle of GPS, it is possible to locate any point on earth to an accuracy of better than the width of a shovel blade. Now it may be that all of Iraq&#039;s WMDs were destroyed back in 1991 in the first Gulf War. It may be, too, that Saddam decided that it was more important to buy another solid gold toilet for his palace than to rebuild his WMD capability afterwards. But ... with a year and a half of advance warning, and all of Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon available to him, do really believe that he couldn&#039;t have hidden his WMDs well enough that they wouldn&#039;t be found? We&#039;ll probably never know for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points:</p>
<p>First, about the war &#8211; Saddam certain had WMDs in the past. We know that because he used them, both against Iran in the Iran-Iraq war, and against his own population. Saddam was also quite openly supporting and sponsoring Palestinian terrorists (he held frequent press conferences about this, where he gave $25k payments to the families of suicide bombers) and allowed at least one senior AQ guy to receive medical treatment in Iraq. AQ then went on to demonstrate a sophisticated capability to attack the US homeland. When you combine all of that with the fact that EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. of the world&#8217;s major foreign intelligence agencies was saying that Saddam STILL had WMDs, that adds up to an intolerable threat &#8211; Iraqi WMDs delivered to the USA by terrorists. It doesn&#8217;t matter who was in the White House, or what party he was from. The moment the second plane hit the World Trade Center, Saddam was a dead man. </p>
<p>Second, about those WMDs &#8211; The entire WMD arsenal of any nation other than the three superpowers would fit comfortably into a three bedroom townhouse. Thanks to the miracle of GPS, it is possible to locate any point on earth to an accuracy of better than the width of a shovel blade. Now it may be that all of Iraq&#8217;s WMDs were destroyed back in 1991 in the first Gulf War. It may be, too, that Saddam decided that it was more important to buy another solid gold toilet for his palace than to rebuild his WMD capability afterwards. But &#8230; with a year and a half of advance warning, and all of Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon available to him, do really believe that he couldn&#8217;t have hidden his WMDs well enough that they wouldn&#8217;t be found? We&#8217;ll probably never know for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

