This page has moved. Click here.

Finite Electroweak Theory

A Spinor Info page.

As the Large Hadron Collider is getting ready for a restart in the spring of 2009, many physicists expect that it would soon find evidence of the Higgs boson. But what if the Higgs boson does not exist?

The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics is an amazing theory. It accounts for all the known families of particles that make up matter, and all their interactions. It even provides a mechanism that allows particles to gain mass. Yet the theory has some shortcomings.

First, it has a large number of free parameters. It is one thing to provide a mechanism to generate mass, it is another thing to predict the magnitude of those masses. This, the theory does not do. Individual particle masses, along with other parameters such as coupling constants, are not predicted, but determined through observation.

But these are just minor problems, relatively speaking. There are two much bigger ones.

First, the theory is based on the assumption that neutrinos are massless. But they aren't. Or, at the very least, there is some mechanism beyond the SM that converts neutrinos of different flavors into one another, because we observed them do just that. What's wrong with giving neutrinos masses, just like we give masses to charged leptons and quarks? Trouble is, neutrinos are ultra light. The corresponding dimensionless quantity in the model would have to be a very small number. People are suspicious of dimensionless quantities in a physical theory that are very far from unity. But we need either such a quantity or a new feature in the SM to account for neutrino oscillations.

However we deal with neutrino oscillations, there's another problem. The cornerstone of the SM is the Higgs particle, which really does two things. First, it offers a mechanism through spontaneous symmetry breaking that allows particles to gain mass. Second, it produces exactly the right terms needed to ensure that when we calculate the probability amplitude of some physical processes, we get finite answers. Jolly good, except... despite dedicated searches over the last two decades, the Higgs boson has not been found.

So what if it just doesn't exist? The Higgs is an oddball particle anyhow. It is the only spin-0 scalar particle in the theory. The self-interactions of the Higgs boson are a source of additional trouble. All of which can be avoided if we don't have a Higgs. But then... how do we end up with massive particles? And how do we avoid predicting nonsense probabilities?

One particular possibility is a theory, developed by Moffat and others in 1991 and onwards, addresses the problem in a somewhat unusual way. Briefly put, the theory incorporates the following features:

With these features, the theory does away with the Higgs boson altogether. It also reproduces the SM at low energies, but predicts deviations at energy levels that may be reachable by present-day instruments. This is important... too many theories nowadays rely on postulates that can never, ever, be confronted with experiment!

The basic steps of building the finite electroweak theory (FEW) are as follows.

The result is a theory in which both fermions and bosons have the right masses, and the rules are almost those of the SM, with two key differences: vector boson masses are running in the vector boson propagators, and the coupling constants are also running with energy.

Some of the more important papers on the FEW are: